My
criticisms of the excesses of the online phenomenon in terms of its
brazen abuse in an unregulated environment has often made me the target
of attacks, with many insisting on quoting the opening paragraph of a
piece I once wrote along these lines as if it is a memorial verse, but
further developments have shown that indeed, liberal, accommodative,
useful and open as the growth of the new media may seem in Nigeria, we
may well, if care is not taken, be dealing with a dangerous tool in the
hands of the unscrupulous which could drive society towards the lunatic
fringe.
The beauty of the new media is its democratic temper. With any
electronic device, anyone at all, can set up a communications unit,
using a phone, a tablet, a laptop, a desktop, and simply occupy the
social space and broadcast information which in a matter of minutes may
go viral and condition public opinion. It grants the person involved
absolute freedom, even anonymity, dangerous anonymity of self, space and
location, but the worst part of it is the freedom from decency,
responsibility and conscience. And so while so much good can be done by
persons exchanging information, and as has turned out, creative jokes
and skits which entertain and amuse, a lot of evil can be committed
through resort to blackmail, abuse, and mischief.
This dangerous dimension is beginning to grow in different
directions and the latest that I have seen is what seems to be the
emergence of cartels, or perhaps cabals in the online industry, with
various persons organizing themselves into groups, and if this were to
be a sign of freedom of association exercised by like minds, it would be
commendable. But rather what is emerging is bitter rivalry among the
various groups, a fierce struggle for territory, unhealthy, cut-throat
competition, and a desperation to out-do each other. The group warriors
are not necessarily fighting for any great ideal, but ego, power,
privilege and access to the corridors of power.
I happen to have suddenly become a victim in the midst of this
turf-fighting, as my name this week was drawn into a cat fight between
two groups: the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) and the
Online Publishers Association of Nigeria (OPAN). These are two of the
emerging groups but there are others: Association of Online Bloggers,
Association of Nigerian Online Publishers (ANOP), the Online Magazines
Publishers Association (OMPA). And who knows, there may well be the
Association of What’s App Users, the Nigerian Association of Twitter
Voltrons, Association of Nigerian BBM Users, National Association of
Chat Group Administrators, all of them fighting over influence, space,
and patronage. This politicization of the online business can only in
the long run diminish its influence and promote opportunism.
The case that I refer to was triggered by a meeting in Lagos,
between the Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed and
a group of online publishers under the umbrella of GOCOP. This prompted
a rival group, the OPAN to issue a statement accusing Alhaji Mohammed
of meeting with the wrong group and ignoring the main stakeholders.
There has been serious “blood-sharing” since then. GOCOP issued a
rejoinder in which it attacked OPAN. And my name was brought in. I was
accused of being the spirit behind OPAN, and an attempt was made to set
me up against Femi Adesina, my successor as Special Adviser on Media
and Publicity to the President of Nigeria. Femi was given special
praise, he being a Trustee of GOCOP, so the whole thing is projected as
OPAN being pro-Jonathan and GOCOP being pro-Buhari.
I was also accused of having influenced the Corporate Affairs
Commission to block the registration of NOPA, the first name that the
other group had chosen when it sought formal registration. I was alleged
to have used the powers of the Presidency to victimize members of then
NOPA, who eventually adopted a new name and got registered. But
obviously, the aggrieved were looking for an opportunity to go after me.
And they believe the time is now right and that their facts are right,
hence they threatened to release “documents”.
They are wrong. Here are the facts: I was invited to be a
Trustee of OPAN in 2010 when I was still Chairman of the Editorial Board
of The Guardian. I was at the time involved either as a
Trustee or contributor to many social causes - motherless children’s
homes, special children, book reading clubs, girl child education
projects, and hence, adding to that list a group that defined its
objective as developing standards in the emerging online space was not a
problem for me. I agreed to be a Trustee of OPAN and I made inputs into
the drafting of the philosophy of the group. It had become clear by
then that the online space was bound to grow and that there was a need
for an articulation of ethical and professional standards, which may not
be officially imposed but which could provide a basis for the
insistence on a responsible use of the internet to promote serious
issues. OPAN secured registration with the CAC, but it remained in a
formative stage throughout the period I was in office, and was only
formally launched late 2015. I did not even attend the launching
ceremony. Having seen that the group had finally found its rhythm and
its objectives properly defined, I offered to step down from the Board
of Trustees. I got to know of the bitter fight over CAC registration
between GOCOP and OPAN in the press release issued by the former.
Let me make this clear: I could not have been involved in that
fight. The CAC is a statutory body and I believe it is in a position to
defend its integrity. Anyone knows that the CAC conducts name-search
before registering any organization and where any conflict in identity
is subsequently reported, it has its own mechanism for resolving such.
If NOPA and OPAN were fighting over nomenclature, it was the job of the
CAC to resolve that, not the Presidency. In any case, my office could
not have supported one group of online publishers against another,
because that would have been counter-productive. My assignment required
me to relate regularly with website owners, bloggers, and all
categories of journalists and they all published our materials. I have
made it clear privately that I probably received more support from
members of GOCOP, many of whom I had always known and with whom I had
shared happier moments, particularly at the St Bottles’ Cathedral in
Lagos: our hang-out in those days.
But I see that twice in the past eight months, there have been
curious attempts to pitch me against my successor, Femi Adesina. In the
imagination of a dubious minority, I am supposed to be fighting him and
make his work difficult. I can imagine the kind of stories that may
have been going back and forth, invented by persons looking for what to
eat. I have been there and I know how it is. But Femi and I have never
fought over anything and we have absolutely no reason to fight. I am
out. He is in. Life goes on. I have nothing against him or the PMB
government. In 2015, the Nigerian people made a choice and spoke. It is a
choice that we respect.
But as if all that is not plain enough, the latest that I have
seen is a 2012 private e-mail “document” purportedly leaked to Sahara
Reporters giving the impression that I worked with an online group to
undermine Sahara Reporters in defence of the Jonathan Government, and of
course the sub-text is to link me with the current war of the online
publishers. This has to do with an e-mail, which the Association of
Nigerian Online Publishers (ANOP) sent to a third party which was
forwarded to me. I was then hearing about ANOP for the first time.
I forwarded the mail to the main promoter of OPAN, the only
one of such groups that was known to me then and I only wanted to know
if this was the same group, given the striking similarity. The leaked
mail is one of many such unsolicited proposals and suggestions that came
to my desk. Nothing came out of it thereafter, and I had no reason to
worry about that innocuous incident until now. I took an oath of office
to defend the interests of the people, President and Government of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria and I did my bit, but it was not the style
of that administration or my office to intimidate, gag, frustrate or
undermine the free media. I had direct access to Omoyele Sowore, the
publisher of Sahara Reporters.
Throughout my four years on the job, he used every single press
release that we issued and always listened to my many protestations. He
always insisted however, that he had his facts, and that he knew more
insiders than I could ever imagine. I was always shocked how State House
documents and inside stories regularly found their way to his desk, and
how on the day the President’s brother died, he had published the story
even before anyone in Aso Rock knew. If the leaked e-mail proves
anything, it is that he and his own colleagues are involved in a bitter
rivalry, and that there is indeed a war of online operators and this can
only get worse with everyone these days, becoming a blogger or online
publisher. This poses a serious challenge for media, reputation, and
perception managers who must continuously swim in an ocean of sharks,
alligators and piranhas. If you relate with A, you could offend B. And
if you receive a mail from C, you could get into trouble, not knowing
which cartel or cabal you are dealing with.
The truth, if we must say so, is that the social media in
Nigeria has become a battle-ground for survival. It is no longer about
young people playing with a phone or a laptop, it is big business, and
where the stomach or sheer rivalry, is involved, we can see that persons
are ready to shed blood, shred reputations and break jaws. It is most
unfortunate that this positive force that could be used for the good of
society is finally going the way of all things. The other truth is that
the big war of communications is no longer fought on the pages of
newspapers, but online and all the bad habits of old have been
transported, without any ethical restraint. This is where the real
danger lies.
The challenge is to insist that online journalists, publishers,
bloggers and tweeters must be held down to certain prudential standards
of practice. The in-fighting is unnecessary. The various associations
can be useful as vehicles of self-regulation, and for promoting values
and best options. They should not become special purpose mechanisms for
patronizing politicians and political office holders.
- See more at: http://www.reubenabati.com.ng/2016-01-29-The-Online-Warriors-By-Reuben-Abati.html#sthash.fR9kNQCV.lAlR5zJs.dpuf
My
criticisms of the excesses of the online phenomenon in terms of its
brazen abuse in an unregulated environment has often made me the target
of attacks, with many insisting on quoting the opening paragraph of a
piece I once wrote along these lines as if it is a memorial verse, but
further developments have shown that indeed, liberal, accommodative,
useful and open as the growth of the new media may seem in Nigeria, we
may well, if care is not taken, be dealing with a dangerous tool in the
hands of the unscrupulous which could drive society towards the lunatic
fringe.
The beauty of the new media is its democratic temper. With any
electronic device, anyone at all, can set up a communications unit,
using a phone, a tablet, a laptop, a desktop, and simply occupy the
social space and broadcast information which in a matter of minutes may
go viral and condition public opinion. It grants the person involved
absolute freedom, even anonymity, dangerous anonymity of self, space and
location, but the worst part of it is the freedom from decency,
responsibility and conscience. And so while so much good can be done by
persons exchanging information, and as has turned out, creative jokes
and skits which entertain and amuse, a lot of evil can be committed
through resort to blackmail, abuse, and mischief.
This dangerous dimension is beginning to grow in different
directions and the latest that I have seen is what seems to be the
emergence of cartels, or perhaps cabals in the online industry, with
various persons organizing themselves into groups, and if this were to
be a sign of freedom of association exercised by like minds, it would be
commendable. But rather what is emerging is bitter rivalry among the
various groups, a fierce struggle for territory, unhealthy, cut-throat
competition, and a desperation to out-do each other. The group warriors
are not necessarily fighting for any great ideal, but ego, power,
privilege and access to the corridors of power.
I happen to have suddenly become a victim in the midst of this
turf-fighting, as my name this week was drawn into a cat fight between
two groups: the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) and the
Online Publishers Association of Nigeria (OPAN). These are two of the
emerging groups but there are others: Association of Online Bloggers,
Association of Nigerian Online Publishers (ANOP), the Online Magazines
Publishers Association (OMPA). And who knows, there may well be the
Association of What’s App Users, the Nigerian Association of Twitter
Voltrons, Association of Nigerian BBM Users, National Association of
Chat Group Administrators, all of them fighting over influence, space,
and patronage. This politicization of the online business can only in
the long run diminish its influence and promote opportunism.
The case that I refer to was triggered by a meeting in Lagos,
between the Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed and
a group of online publishers under the umbrella of GOCOP. This prompted
a rival group, the OPAN to issue a statement accusing Alhaji Mohammed
of meeting with the wrong group and ignoring the main stakeholders.
There has been serious “blood-sharing” since then. GOCOP issued a
rejoinder in which it attacked OPAN. And my name was brought in. I was
accused of being the spirit behind OPAN, and an attempt was made to set
me up against Femi Adesina, my successor as Special Adviser on Media
and Publicity to the President of Nigeria. Femi was given special
praise, he being a Trustee of GOCOP, so the whole thing is projected as
OPAN being pro-Jonathan and GOCOP being pro-Buhari.
I was also accused of having influenced the Corporate Affairs
Commission to block the registration of NOPA, the first name that the
other group had chosen when it sought formal registration. I was alleged
to have used the powers of the Presidency to victimize members of then
NOPA, who eventually adopted a new name and got registered. But
obviously, the aggrieved were looking for an opportunity to go after me.
And they believe the time is now right and that their facts are right,
hence they threatened to release “documents”.
They are wrong. Here are the facts: I was invited to be a
Trustee of OPAN in 2010 when I was still Chairman of the Editorial Board
of The Guardian. I was at the time involved either as a
Trustee or contributor to many social causes - motherless children’s
homes, special children, book reading clubs, girl child education
projects, and hence, adding to that list a group that defined its
objective as developing standards in the emerging online space was not a
problem for me. I agreed to be a Trustee of OPAN and I made inputs into
the drafting of the philosophy of the group. It had become clear by
then that the online space was bound to grow and that there was a need
for an articulation of ethical and professional standards, which may not
be officially imposed but which could provide a basis for the
insistence on a responsible use of the internet to promote serious
issues. OPAN secured registration with the CAC, but it remained in a
formative stage throughout the period I was in office, and was only
formally launched late 2015. I did not even attend the launching
ceremony. Having seen that the group had finally found its rhythm and
its objectives properly defined, I offered to step down from the Board
of Trustees. I got to know of the bitter fight over CAC registration
between GOCOP and OPAN in the press release issued by the former.
Let me make this clear: I could not have been involved in that
fight. The CAC is a statutory body and I believe it is in a position to
defend its integrity. Anyone knows that the CAC conducts name-search
before registering any organization and where any conflict in identity
is subsequently reported, it has its own mechanism for resolving such.
If NOPA and OPAN were fighting over nomenclature, it was the job of the
CAC to resolve that, not the Presidency. In any case, my office could
not have supported one group of online publishers against another,
because that would have been counter-productive. My assignment required
me to relate regularly with website owners, bloggers, and all
categories of journalists and they all published our materials. I have
made it clear privately that I probably received more support from
members of GOCOP, many of whom I had always known and with whom I had
shared happier moments, particularly at the St Bottles’ Cathedral in
Lagos: our hang-out in those days.
But I see that twice in the past eight months, there have been
curious attempts to pitch me against my successor, Femi Adesina. In the
imagination of a dubious minority, I am supposed to be fighting him and
make his work difficult. I can imagine the kind of stories that may
have been going back and forth, invented by persons looking for what to
eat. I have been there and I know how it is. But Femi and I have never
fought over anything and we have absolutely no reason to fight. I am
out. He is in. Life goes on. I have nothing against him or the PMB
government. In 2015, the Nigerian people made a choice and spoke. It is a
choice that we respect.
But as if all that is not plain enough, the latest that I have
seen is a 2012 private e-mail “document” purportedly leaked to Sahara
Reporters giving the impression that I worked with an online group to
undermine Sahara Reporters in defence of the Jonathan Government, and of
course the sub-text is to link me with the current war of the online
publishers. This has to do with an e-mail, which the Association of
Nigerian Online Publishers (ANOP) sent to a third party which was
forwarded to me. I was then hearing about ANOP for the first time.
I forwarded the mail to the main promoter of OPAN, the only
one of such groups that was known to me then and I only wanted to know
if this was the same group, given the striking similarity. The leaked
mail is one of many such unsolicited proposals and suggestions that came
to my desk. Nothing came out of it thereafter, and I had no reason to
worry about that innocuous incident until now. I took an oath of office
to defend the interests of the people, President and Government of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria and I did my bit, but it was not the style
of that administration or my office to intimidate, gag, frustrate or
undermine the free media. I had direct access to Omoyele Sowore, the
publisher of Sahara Reporters.
Throughout my four years on the job, he used every single press
release that we issued and always listened to my many protestations. He
always insisted however, that he had his facts, and that he knew more
insiders than I could ever imagine. I was always shocked how State House
documents and inside stories regularly found their way to his desk, and
how on the day the President’s brother died, he had published the story
even before anyone in Aso Rock knew. If the leaked e-mail proves
anything, it is that he and his own colleagues are involved in a bitter
rivalry, and that there is indeed a war of online operators and this can
only get worse with everyone these days, becoming a blogger or online
publisher. This poses a serious challenge for media, reputation, and
perception managers who must continuously swim in an ocean of sharks,
alligators and piranhas. If you relate with A, you could offend B. And
if you receive a mail from C, you could get into trouble, not knowing
which cartel or cabal you are dealing with.
The truth, if we must say so, is that the social media in
Nigeria has become a battle-ground for survival. It is no longer about
young people playing with a phone or a laptop, it is big business, and
where the stomach or sheer rivalry, is involved, we can see that persons
are ready to shed blood, shred reputations and break jaws. It is most
unfortunate that this positive force that could be used for the good of
society is finally going the way of all things. The other truth is that
the big war of communications is no longer fought on the pages of
newspapers, but online and all the bad habits of old have been
transported, without any ethical restraint. This is where the real
danger lies.
The challenge is to insist that online journalists, publishers,
bloggers and tweeters must be held down to certain prudential standards
of practice. The in-fighting is unnecessary. The various associations
can be useful as vehicles of self-regulation, and for promoting values
and best options. They should not become special purpose mechanisms for
patronizing politicians and political office holders.
- See more at: http://www.reubenabati.com.ng/2016-01-29-The-Online-Warriors-By-Reuben-Abati.html#sthash.fR9kNQCV.lAlR5zJs.dpuf
My criticisms of the excesses of the
online phenomenon in terms of its brazen abuse in an unregulated environment
has often made me the target of attacks, with many insisting on quoting the
opening paragraph of a piece I once wrote along these lines as if it is a
memorial verse, but further developments have shown that indeed, liberal,
accommodative, useful and open as the growth of the new media may seem in
Nigeria, we may well, if care is not taken, be dealing with a dangerous tool in
the hands of the unscrupulous which could drive society towards the lunatic
fringe.
The
beauty of the new media is its democratic temper. With any electronic device,
anyone at all, can set up a communications unit, using a phone, a tablet, a
laptop, a desktop, and simply occupy the social space and broadcast information
which in a matter of minutes may go viral and condition public opinion. It
grants the person involved absolute freedom, even anonymity, dangerous anonymity
of self, space and location, but the worst part of it is the freedom from
decency, responsibility and conscience. And so while so much good can be done
by persons exchanging information, and as has turned out, creative jokes and
skits which entertain and amuse, a lot of evil can be committed through resort
to blackmail, abuse, and mischief.
This dangerous
dimension is beginning to grow in different directions and the latest that I
have seen is what seems to be the emergence of cartels, or perhaps cabals in
the online industry, with various persons organizing themselves into groups,
and if this were to be a sign of freedom of association exercised by like
minds, it would be commendable. But rather what is emerging is bitter rivalry
among the various groups, a fierce struggle for territory, unhealthy,
cut-throat competition, and a desperation to out-do each other. The group
warriors are not necessarily fighting for any great ideal, but ego, power,
privilege and access to the corridors of power.
I
happen to have suddenly become a victim in the midst of this turf-fighting, as
my name this week was drawn into a cat fight between two groups: the Guild of
Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) and the Online Publishers Association of
Nigeria (OPAN). These are two of the emerging groups but there are others:
Association of Online Bloggers, Association of Nigerian Online Publishers
(ANOP), the Online Magazines Publishers Association (OMPA). And who knows,
there may well be the Association of What’s App Users, the Nigerian Association
of Twitter Voltrons, Association of Nigerian BBM Users, National Association of
Chat Group Administrators, all of them fighting over influence, space, and
patronage. This politicization of the online business can only in the long run
diminish its influence and promote opportunism.
The
case that I refer to was triggered by a meeting in Lagos, between the Minister
of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed and a group of online
publishers under the umbrella of GOCOP. This prompted a rival group, the OPAN
to issue a statement accusing Alhaji Mohammed of meeting with the wrong group
and ignoring the main stakeholders. There has been serious “blood-sharing”
since then. GOCOP issued a rejoinder in which it attacked OPAN. And my
name was brought in. I was accused of being the spirit behind OPAN, and
an attempt was made to set me up against Femi Adesina, my successor as Special
Adviser on Media and Publicity to the President of Nigeria. Femi was given
special praise, he being a Trustee of GOCOP, so the whole thing is projected as
OPAN being pro-Jonathan and GOCOP being pro-Buhari.
I was
also accused of having influenced the Corporate Affairs Commission to block the
registration of NOPA, the first name that the other group had chosen when it
sought formal registration. I was alleged to have used the powers of the
Presidency to victimize members of then NOPA, who eventually adopted a new name
and got registered. But obviously, the aggrieved were looking for an opportunity
to go after me. And they believe the time is now right and that their facts are
right, hence they threatened to release “documents”.
They
are wrong. Here are the facts: I was invited to be a Trustee of OPAN in
2010 when I was still Chairman of the Editorial Board of The Guardian. I
was at the time involved either as a Trustee or contributor to many social
causes - motherless children’s homes, special children, book reading clubs,
girl child education projects, and hence, adding to that list a group that
defined its objective as developing standards in the emerging online space was
not a problem for me. I agreed to be a Trustee of OPAN and I made inputs into
the drafting of the philosophy of the group. It had become clear by then that
the online space was bound to grow and that there was a need for an
articulation of ethical and professional standards, which may not be officially
imposed but which could provide a basis for the insistence on a responsible use
of the internet to promote serious issues. OPAN secured registration with the
CAC, but it remained in a formative stage throughout the period I was in
office, and was only formally launched late 2015. I did not even attend the
launching ceremony. Having seen that the group had finally found its rhythm and
its objectives properly defined, I offered to step down from the Board of
Trustees. I got to know of the bitter fight over CAC registration between
GOCOP and OPAN in the press release issued by the former.
Let
me make this clear: I could not have been involved in that fight. The CAC is a
statutory body and I believe it is in a position to defend its integrity.
Anyone knows that the CAC conducts name-search before registering any
organization and where any conflict in identity is subsequently reported, it
has its own mechanism for resolving such. If NOPA and OPAN were fighting over
nomenclature, it was the job of the CAC to resolve that, not the Presidency. In
any case, my office could not have supported one group of online publishers
against another, because that would have been counter-productive. My
assignment required me to relate regularly with website owners, bloggers, and
all categories of journalists and they all published our materials. I have made
it clear privately that I probably received more support from members of GOCOP,
many of whom I had always known and with whom I had shared happier moments,
particularly at the St Bottles’ Cathedral in Lagos: our hang-out in those days.
But I see that twice in the past eight months, there have been curious
attempts to pitch me against my successor, Femi Adesina. In the imagination of
a dubious minority, I am supposed to be fighting him and make his work
difficult. I can imagine the kind of stories that may have been going back and
forth, invented by persons looking for what to eat. I have been there and I
know how it is. But Femi and I have never fought over anything and we have
absolutely no reason to fight. I am out. He is in. Life goes on. I have nothing
against him or the PMB government. In 2015, the Nigerian people made a choice
and spoke. It is a choice that we respect.
But as if all that is not plain enough, the latest that I have seen
is a 2012 private e-mail “document” purportedly leaked to Sahara Reporters
giving the impression that I worked with an online group to undermine Sahara
Reporters in defence of the Jonathan Government, and of course the sub-text is
to link me with the current war of the online publishers. This has to do with
an e-mail, which the Association of Nigerian Online Publishers (ANOP) sent to a
third party which was forwarded to me. I was then hearing about ANOP for the
first time.
I forwarded the mail to the main promoter of OPAN, the only one of such groups
that was known to me then and I only wanted to know if this was the same group,
given the striking similarity. The leaked mail is one of many such unsolicited
proposals and suggestions that came to my desk. Nothing came out of it
thereafter, and I had no reason to worry about that innocuous incident until
now. I took an oath of office to defend the interests of the people, President
and Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and I did my bit, but it was
not the style of that administration or my office to intimidate, gag, frustrate
or undermine the free media. I had direct access to Omoyele Sowore, the
publisher of Sahara Reporters.
Throughout my four years on the job, he used every single press release that we
issued and always listened to my many protestations. He always insisted
however, that he had his facts, and that he knew more insiders than I could
ever imagine. I was always shocked how State House documents and inside stories
regularly found their way to his desk, and how on the day the President’s
brother died, he had published the story even before anyone in Aso Rock knew.
If the leaked e-mail proves anything, it is that he and his own colleagues are
involved in a bitter rivalry, and that there is indeed a war of online operators
and this can only get worse with everyone these days, becoming a blogger or
online publisher. This poses a serious challenge for media,
reputation, and perception managers who must continuously swim in an ocean of
sharks, alligators and piranhas. If you relate with A, you could offend B. And
if you receive a mail from C, you could get into trouble, not knowing which
cartel or cabal you are dealing with.
The
truth, if we must say so, is that the social media in Nigeria has become a
battle-ground for survival. It is no longer about young people playing with a
phone or a laptop, it is big business, and where the stomach or sheer rivalry,
is involved, we can see that persons are ready to shed blood, shred reputations
and break jaws. It is most unfortunate that this positive force that could be
used for the good of society is finally going the way of all things. The other
truth is that the big war of communications is no longer fought on the pages of
newspapers, but online and all the bad habits of old have been transported,
without any ethical restraint. This is where the real danger lies.
The
challenge is to insist that online journalists, publishers, bloggers and
tweeters must be held down to certain prudential standards of practice. The
in-fighting is unnecessary. The various associations can be useful as vehicles
of self-regulation, and for promoting values and best options. They
should not become special purpose mechanisms for patronizing politicians and
political office holders.
ITREALMS ... everything news digitally!
